IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST BENEFICENT, THE MOST MERCIFUL |
In an attempt to refute the enormous amount of evidence presented wherein the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) categorically said that he was the last prophet and messnger, most Bahais will say yes. But in the same breath, they will also say that the Bab and Bahaullah did not claim to be prophets and messengers but manifestations. They will also say that the other prophets were to warn of the coming of the Day of Judgment and the Bab and Bahaullah inaugurated this Mighty Day. Now to this I will say 2 things. Firstly, many Bahais at the same time claim that the coming of each of the messengers was also another Day of Judgment in the sense that mankind had to judge whether they would believe in the messenger or not Also, secondly, Bab and Bahaullah also made prophecies just like all the other prophets. For example, didn't Bahaullah prophecy the coming of another Manifestation in 1000 years and didn't he also claim that his Baha cycle would last for (hold your breath!) 500,000 years? If so then Bahaullah was also prophecying and warning of another coming major Day of Judgment. You see these semantics are now getting silly. Its like me claiming now that I am an "enlightener" and everyone in my "cycle" will be called "enlighteners" and so when Bahaullah said that no new "manifestation" would come in 1000 years it doesn't exclude me because I am an "enlightener" not a "manifestation". Besides the silliness, these Bahai arguments are mute because the Bab and Bahaullah DID use the words prophets and messengers for themselves. For example : "For they [the Manifestations] one and all summon the people of the earth to acknowledge the Unity of God, and herald unto them the Kawthar of an infinite grace and bounty. They are all invested with the robe of Prophethood, and honoured with the mantle of glory." (5)
The Light of Divine Guidance, Second Volume, by Shoghi Effendi, pp. 8-9 says, real Bahá'í would be one who is convinced that Bahá'u'lláh was a world-teacher and a Messenger of God bearing to mankind a great Message, Selections from the Writings of the Báb, p. 159 says says,
Some Answered Questions, by `Abdu'l-Bahá, p. 152 says,
Some Answered Questions, by `Abdu'l-Bahá, pp. 164-165 says,
Bahá'u'lláh and the New Era, by J. E. Esslemont, pp. 8-9 says,
Selections from the Writings of the Báb, pp. 61-62 says,
Selections from the Writings of the Báb, pp. 124-125 says,
Paris Talks, by `Abdu'l-Bahá, p. 103 says,
The Promulgation of Universal Peace, by `Abdu'l-Bahá, pp. 313-314 says,
Messages to the Bahá'í World: 1950-1957, by Shoghi Effendi, p. 94 says,
Messages to the Bahá'í World: 1950-1957, by Shoghi Effendi, pp. 103-104 says,
Then we get some Baha'is who will say, that, yes, the Qur'an says that Muhammad (pbuh) was the last prophet but it doesn't say that he was the last messenger (the Prophet Muhhamd (pbuh) in his sayings explicitly said on so many occasions that he was the last prophet and messenger AND to make it even more clear he said that no new community of believers will be raised by God after his nation, the muslims). So we tell Bahais that being a prophet is a pre-requisite to being a messenger. You cannot be a messenger without also being a prophet. The Bahai's will retort that no, the messengership might occur together with prophethood but they are separate things and that, yes, Bab and Bahaullah were messengers but not prophets. Now, I have already quoted many quotes from the Bahai scriptures that say that the Bab and Bahaullah were prophets (not the least of which is the first quote given wherein Bahaullah himself says that ALL manifestations are also prophets). So then we ask our creative Bahai friends, what is the difference between messenger and prophet and the asnwer he gives goes something like this: messengers are revealed books to and a code of law while prophets have no revealed book and only follow the messenger under his shadow and confirm him. So we say fine, then explain the followng:
Also in 3:81 the Holy Qur'an says:
As you can see this little theory of Bahais once again doesn't stand up to the test put forward by the Bahais themselves. So what answer is there? God alone knows the true difference of messenger versus prophet or even if there's a difference. Obviously it is not as simple as Baha'is claim that messengers receive a book and a new code of law and prophets follow them under their shadow (a comparison often given is like David and Solomon who were prophets following Moses who was a prophet and a messenger). The only answer I have received from Bahais when confronted with all this evidence was basically (to paraphrase) : "well yes there are prophets and there are prophets". Well to be honest with you, once you get into those kind of realms of personal conjecture by Bahais with nothing else to say, you have to say the argument can't progress further because in this terrain logic is a foreigner and self-serving argumentation the host. Suffice to say when one says someone is the last of prophets, he actually means it. He doesn't mean he's the last of one kind of prophethood and not of another. Finally, the above arguments are mute as Baha'u'llah admitted Muhammad (pbuh) to have ended both prophethood and Messengerhood: "Salutations and peace be upon the Lord of mankind, the educator of the nations, He, through whom messengership [risálat] and prophethood [nubuwwat] have been consummated [intahat]." (Bahá'u'lláh, Ishráqát 293) "I beseech Thee ... by Him Whom Thou hast ordained to be the Seal of the Prophets and of Thy Messengers."
Also Read: blog comments powered by Disqus |
| GET RSS
| |||||||||||||||||